From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randall v. Morning Journal Assn

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1898
22 Misc. 715 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)

Opinion

February, 1898.

Herbert J. Hindes, for appellant.

Einstein Townsend, for respondent.


The question brought up for review concerns the power of the court below, in adjusting the costs and disbursements of the action, to tax and allow to the respondent the sum of $10 paid by it for the services of an expert witness who testified for it on the trial. There is no authority for such an allowance. The fees of witnesses attending the trial in a District Court are fixed by section 1370 of the New York City Consolidation Act, and only such as the statute sanctions can be allowed. Although it may be necessary, in order to secure expert evidence, to pay the witness compensation for the service which is required of him, outside of the allowance prescribed by law for his attendance, it is well settled that the sum so paid cannot be included in the taxable disbursements of the action. Matter of Bender, 86 Hun, 570. Judgment modified by deducting therefrom the sum of $10, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

GILDERSLEEVE and GIEGERICH, JJ., concur.

Judgment modified, and as modified, affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Randall v. Morning Journal Assn

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Feb 1, 1898
22 Misc. 715 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)
Case details for

Randall v. Morning Journal Assn

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL J. RANDALL, Appellant, v . THE MORNING JOURNAL ASSOCIATION…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1898

Citations

22 Misc. 715 (N.Y. App. Term 1898)
49 N.Y.S. 1064