From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randall v. T. Kimura

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 3, 2010
No. 2:10-cv-0052 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-0052 JFM (PC).

December 3, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's November 18, 2010, request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: December 2, 2010.


Summaries of

Randall v. T. Kimura

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 3, 2010
No. 2:10-cv-0052 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Randall v. T. Kimura

Case Details

Full title:JERALD RANDALL, Plaintiff, v. T. KIMURA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 3, 2010

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-0052 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2010)