From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randall v. T. Kimura

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 10, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0052 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-0052 JAM JFM (PC).

August 10, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 6, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 6, 2011, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant Wrigley's February 14, 2011 motion to dismiss is denied; and

3. Defendant Wrigley shall answer the first amended complaint within ten days from the date of this order.

DATED: August 9, 2011


Summaries of

Randall v. T. Kimura

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 10, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-0052 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Randall v. T. Kimura

Case Details

Full title:JERALD RANDALL, Plaintiff, v. T. KIMURA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 10, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-0052 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)