Randall v. Hill

Full title: ELIZABETH RANDALL, Petitioner, v. MOLLY HILL, Warden, Respondent.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2020

Case No. EDCV 17-2096-JGB (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 17-2096-JGB (LAL)

01-31-2020

ELIZABETH RANDALL, Petitioner, v. MOLLY HILL, Warden, Respondent.

HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

DATED: January 31, 2020

/s/_________

HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE