From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randall Mech., Inc. v. Sec'y of Labor

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Mar 18, 2020
No. 18-12959 (11th Cir. Mar. 18, 2020)

Opinion

No. 18-12959

03-18-2020

RANDALL MECHANICAL, INC., Petitioner, v. SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] OSHRC Docket No. 17-1595 Petition for Review of a Decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission Before JORDAN, TJOFLAT, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The Honorable William B. Traxler, Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting by designation. --------

Following oral argument, and a review of the record, we vacate the ALJ's order granting the Secretary's motion for reconsideration and dismissing Randall Mechanical's notice of contest. As we have explained, the "[Occupational Safety and Health Review] Commission and its ALJs are bound to follow the law of the circuit to which the case would most likely be appealed." Comtran Grp., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 722 F.3d 1304, 1307 (11th Cir. 2013). The Commission has said the same thing. See Sec'y of Labor v. Interstate Brands Corp., 20 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) 1102, *3 n.7, 2003 WL 1961274 (2003) (applying Third Circuit law with respect to the Secretary's burden of proof regarding a certain violation). We therefore remand to the ALJ with instructions to apply Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit precedent with respect to Randall Mechanical's Rule 60(b)(1) motion. We express no view on the merits of that motion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Randall Mech., Inc. v. Sec'y of Labor

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Mar 18, 2020
No. 18-12959 (11th Cir. Mar. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Randall Mech., Inc. v. Sec'y of Labor

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL MECHANICAL, INC., Petitioner, v. SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 18, 2020

Citations

No. 18-12959 (11th Cir. Mar. 18, 2020)