From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ranchhod v. Washington Mutual Bank

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 27, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2824 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2824 MCE GGH PS.

April 27, 2011


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed March 4, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen days, why his action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The fourteen day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Ranchhod v. Washington Mutual Bank

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 27, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2824 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Ranchhod v. Washington Mutual Bank

Case Details

Full title:BALKRISHNA RANCHHOD, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 27, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2824 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)