From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jul 8, 2015
No. 10-17803 (9th Cir. Jul. 8, 2015)

Opinion

No. 10-17803 No. 10-17878

07-08-2015

BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA, a federally recognized Indian tribe, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.


FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 4:09-cv-01471-CW ORDER Before: Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, Alex Kozinski, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, Susan P. Graber, William A. Fletcher, Richard A. Paez, Jay S. Bybee, Milan D. Smith, Jr., Morgan Christen and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed June 4, 2015, and published at — F.3d —, 2015 WL 34998884, is amended as follows:

At slip opinion page six, line eight, insert a new footnote 1 after < district court. > but before < Id. > as follows:

< In Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 75 (1996), the Supreme Court held that Section 2710(d)(7) does not abrogate the states' Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity. California's sovereign immunity is not implicated here, however, because the State has waived its immunity to suit in this context. See Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of Rincon Reservation v. Schwarzenegger, 602 F.3d 1019, 1026 (9th Cir. 2010). >.

At slip opinion page twelve, line eleven insert < under Federal jurisdiction in 1934 and was not > after < tribe was not > and before < recognized >.

At slip opinion page twelve, line fourteen insert < , 395 > after < 385 >.

At slip opinion page eighteen, lines four-five remove < if the Secretary of the Interior approves the compact > and replace that text with < once the Secretary of the Interior prescribes procedures to govern gaming that are consistent with that selection >.

At slip opinion page eighteen, line seven insert < See 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(7)(B)(vii) > after < seeks. > and before < Big Lagoon Rancheria >.

With the foregoing amendments to the opinion, California's Petition for En Banc Panel Rehearing is DENIED. No subsequent petitions for rehearing may be filed.


Summaries of

Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jul 8, 2015
No. 10-17803 (9th Cir. Jul. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California

Case Details

Full title:BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA, a federally recognized Indian tribe…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 8, 2015

Citations

No. 10-17803 (9th Cir. Jul. 8, 2015)