From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rance v. Barron

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Jun 29, 2006
Case No. 5:05cv103-SPM/MD (N.D. Fla. Jun. 29, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 5:05cv103-SPM/MD.

June 29, 2006


ORDER


THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated February 28, 2006 (doc. 13). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 13) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice to Petitioner's opportunity to refile after exhausting administrative remedies.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rance v. Barron

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Jun 29, 2006
Case No. 5:05cv103-SPM/MD (N.D. Fla. Jun. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Rance v. Barron

Case Details

Full title:EDMUNDO MONTGOMERY RANCE, Petitioner, v. JOSE BARRON and ALBERTO GONZALEZ…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Jun 29, 2006

Citations

Case No. 5:05cv103-SPM/MD (N.D. Fla. Jun. 29, 2006)