Opinion
No. 366, 2018
02-18-2019
RAMUNNO & RAMUNNO, P.A. INTERVENOR IN (C.A. No: N15C-03-060, GILES v. BOYKIN-BOYD) Appellant, v. LUNDY LAW, L.L.P. Appellees.
Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware C.A. No. N15C-03-060 Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
(1) Ramunno and Ramunno, P.A. ("Ramunno") appeals from a Superior Court order awarding 15% of a fee collected by Lundy Law in a personal injury action in which Ramunno's former client was the plaintiff.
(2) Ramunno claims that the award was "unreasonable, unfair and arbitrary and not the result of a reasonable, articulate and rational process" because the Superior Court failed to adequately explain the basis for its opinion.
Op. Br. at 3.
(3) We are satisfied that the Superior Court considered the relevant factors in makings its determination that Ramunno was entitled on a quantum meruit basis to 15% —or $6,000.00—of Lundy Law's 40% contingency fee.
(4) We therefore affirm the Superior Court's judgment on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its June 1, 2018 opinion and June 19, 2018 order granting in part and denying in part Ramunno's motion for reargument.
Giles v. Boykin-Brown, 2018 WL 2464873 (Del. Super. June 1, 2018).
Giles v. Boykin-Brown, N15C-03-060 (Del. Super. June 19, 2018) Dkt. No. 48. --------
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court be AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F . Traynor
Justice