Opinion
No. 08-56169.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed October 13, 2009.
James Blake Ramsey, Beaumont, CA, pro se.
Paul F. Arentz, Esquire, Pamela J. Holmes, Joel A. Davis, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Pre-siding. D.C. No. 5:07-cv-01096-JSL-SH.
Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
James Blake Ramsey appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations and fraud in connection with an unlawful detainer proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Rhoades v. Avon Prods., Inc., 504 F.3d 1151, 1156 (9th Cir. 2007), and we affirm.
Ramsey does not raise any contentions concerning the grounds for dismissal, and we thus deem any such challenge abandoned. See Cook v. Schriro, 538 F.3d 1000, 1014 n. 5 (9th Cir. 2008), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1033, 173 L.Ed.2d 301 (2009). Ramsey's procedural challenges are unavailing.
AFFIRMED.