From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramsey v. Frisch's

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 3, 2017
Case No. 1:16-cv-1129 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 3, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16-cv-1129

01-03-2017

DAVID RAMSEY, Plaintiff, v. FRISCH'S, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on December 9, 2016, submitted a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 4). No objections were filed.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety.

Accordingly:

1. Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED;
2. The Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a) an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore Plaintiff is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. However, Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals; and

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 1/3/17

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ramsey v. Frisch's

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 3, 2017
Case No. 1:16-cv-1129 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Ramsey v. Frisch's

Case Details

Full title:DAVID RAMSEY, Plaintiff, v. FRISCH'S, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 3, 2017

Citations

Case No. 1:16-cv-1129 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 3, 2017)

Citing Cases

Shah v. Fortive Corp.

No plausible claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 on these facts has been articulated and that part of the…

Green v. Commuteair

While Plaintiff appears to believe these accusations were the result of racism, he provides no allegations to…