From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramsey v. Baker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 13, 1915
148 P. 94 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4058

Opinion Filed April 13, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court 38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix.,) the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)

Error from District Court, Coal County; Robt. M. Rainey, Judge.

Action by Frank Baker against the Oklahoma Central Railway Company, a corporation, and others. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant Asa E. Ramsey, as receiver of the Oklahoma Central Railway Company, a corporation, brings error. Dismissed.

J.G. Ralls and Fooshee Brunson, for plaintiff in error.

Dorset Carter, for defendant in error.


The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on June 8, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.

The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court. (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 P. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Ramsey v. Baker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 13, 1915
148 P. 94 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Ramsey v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:RAMSEY v. BAKER et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 13, 1915

Citations

148 P. 94 (Okla. 1915)
148 P. 94

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Fabrico v. Trimble

[Fraternal Bankers v. Wire, 150 Mo. App. 89.] It is a service which when made by the sheriff, is undisputable…