From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rampart Capital Corp. v. Abke

Supreme Court of Texas
Jul 1, 1999
1 S.W.3d 107 (Tex. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-0552.

July 1, 1999.

On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas.

Jeffrey J. Brookner, Stephen G. Scholl, Houston, for petitioner.

Dennis K. Drake, Fred Shannon, Charles Estee, San Antonio, for respondent.

Justice Hecht, joined by Justice Owen, dissenting from the denial of the petition for review.


Petition for Review Denied.


I respectfully dissent from the Court's denial of the petition for review. This is a suit on a promissory note against a limited partner in circumstances described in Rampart Capital Corporation v. Maguire, 974 S.W.2d 195 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, pet. denied). In an unpublished opinion essentially identical to its opinion in Maguire, a divided court of appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the action for want of prosecution. As in Maguire, I would grant Rampart's petition, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and remand the case for further proceedings. Rampart Capital Corp. v. Maguire, 1 S.W.2d 106 (Tex. 1999) (Hecht, J., dissenting).


Summaries of

Rampart Capital Corp. v. Abke

Supreme Court of Texas
Jul 1, 1999
1 S.W.3d 107 (Tex. 1999)
Case details for

Rampart Capital Corp. v. Abke

Case Details

Full title:RAMPART CAPITAL CORPORATION, Petitioner v. Bonnie L. ABKE, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Jul 1, 1999

Citations

1 S.W.3d 107 (Tex. 1999)

Citing Cases

Guest v. Dixon

Id. Moreover, because the order of dismissal recites that the case is "dismissed for want of prosecution," we…