From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramous v. Warren Properties, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 2, 2008
No. 2:08cv1901 FCD JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:08cv1901 FCD JFM PS.

October 2, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On September 8, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

On September 8, 2008, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. In light of the findings and recommendation issued the same date, defendant's motion is moot and will be denied without prejudice; the October 17, 2008 hearing will also be vacated.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's September 8, 2008 motion to dismiss (docket no. 5) is denied without prejudice, and the October 17, 2008 hearing set before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds is vacated.

2. The findings and recommendations filed September 8, 2008, are adopted in full.

3. This action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Ramous v. Warren Properties, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 2, 2008
No. 2:08cv1901 FCD JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Ramous v. Warren Properties, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD RAMOUS, Plaintiff, v. WARREN PROPERTIES, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 2, 2008

Citations

No. 2:08cv1901 FCD JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2008)