From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 11-C-169, 10-C-847 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 11-C-169, 10-C-847.

October 18, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff Ramos filed a motion to reduce the appellate filing fee in Case No. 11-C-169. He states that he appealed my initial determination that the case should be merged into Case No. 10-C-847. Then, when he filed an amended notice of appeal, he was assessed a second appellate filing fee due (apparently) to the confusion about the multiple case numbers his appeal had been assigned. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4)(B)(iii) provides that "no additional fee is required to file an amended notice." Accordingly, although two notices of appeal were docketed, it was an error to assess two appellate filing fees here because the second notice was captioned "amended notice". The motion is GRANTED. The total appellate filing fee now due is $455, not the $910 originally assessed.

SO ORDERED this 17th day of October, 2011.


Summaries of

Ramos v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 11-C-169, 10-C-847 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Ramos v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. ROGER WALKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. 11-C-169, 10-C-847 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 18, 2011)