From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Oct 17, 2011
Case No.11-C-169,10-C-847 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.11-C-169,10-C-847

10-17-2011

MICHAEL RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. ROGER WALKER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Ramos filed a motion to reduce the appellate filing fee in Case No. 11-C-169. He states that he appealed my initial determination that the case should be merged into Case No. 10-C-847. Then, when he filed an amended notice of appeal, he was assessed a second appellate filing fee due (apparently) to the confusion about the multiple case numbers his appeal had been assigned. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(iii) provides that "no additional fee is required to file an amended notice." Accordingly, although two notices of appeal were docketed, it was an error to assess two appellate filing fees here because the second notice was captioned "amended notice". The motion is GRANTED. The total appellate filing fee now due is $455, not the $910 originally assessed.

William C. Griesbach

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ramos v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Oct 17, 2011
Case No.11-C-169,10-C-847 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Ramos v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. ROGER WALKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

Case No.11-C-169,10-C-847 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 17, 2011)