From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 22, 2016
NO. 03-15-00823-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 22, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 03-15-00823-CR

07-22-2016

Louis Ramos, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY
NO. CR-15-0603, THE HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDINGORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE APPELLATE RECORD TO APPELLANT

PER CURIAM

Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant's counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.

Appellant's pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter's record and clerk's record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before August 1, 2016.See id. at 321.

It is ordered on July 22, 2016. Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Ramos v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 22, 2016
NO. 03-15-00823-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Ramos v. State

Case Details

Full title:Louis Ramos, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jul 22, 2016

Citations

NO. 03-15-00823-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 22, 2016)