From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 27, 2016
No. 05-15-01228-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 27, 2016)

Opinion

No. 05-15-01228-CR

01-27-2016

MARK ANTHONY RAMOS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F15-51172-I

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Schenck
Opinion by Justice Schenck

Mark Anthony Ramos waived a jury and pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a) (West 2011). The trial court assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. After reviewing counsel's brief, appellant's pro se response, and the record, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases). We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

Although not an arguable issue, we note the trial court's judgment incorrectly states there was a plea bargain agreement. The record reflects appellant entered an open plea of guilty to the charge in the indictment. Accordingly, we modify the section of the judgment entitled "terms of plea bargain" to state "open." See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529-30 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref'd).

As modified, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47 151228F.U05

JUDGMENT

Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F15-51172-I).
Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, Justices Bridges and Lang-Miers participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is MODIFIED as follows:

The section entitled "Terms of Plea Bargain" is modified to show "Open."

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court's judgment.

Judgment entered January 27, 2016.


Summaries of

Ramos v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 27, 2016
No. 05-15-01228-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Ramos v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK ANTHONY RAMOS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

No. 05-15-01228-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 27, 2016)

Citing Cases

Ex parte Ramos

The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Ramos v. State, No. 05-15-01228-CR (Tex. App. — Dallas,…