From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 21, 1990
569 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-00194.

November 21, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Harry Lee Coe, III, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon. However, we agree with appellant that attorney's fees and costs were improperly imposed against him in the final judgment after not being mentioned at the sentencing hearing. Because the written order does not properly conform to the oral pronouncement, we strike the fees and costs without prejudice to reimpose if the court follows proper procedures.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ramos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 21, 1990
569 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Ramos v. State

Case Details

Full title:NELSON RAMOS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 21, 1990

Citations

569 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)