From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 29, 2013
500 F. App'x 956 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2011-7169

03-29-2013

JOSE L. SERRANO RAMOS, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 10-0367, Judge Mary J. Schoelen.

Before REYNA, BRYSON, and LINN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Judge Bryson assumed senior status on January 7, 2013.

ORDER

Jose L. Serrano Ramos moves for reconsideration of this court's January 3, 2013 order affirming the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

Mr. Ramos appears concerned with "hav[ing] to pay the cost of [his] defense and Eric K. Shinseki, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs too," as a result of this court's decision.

The docketing fee in this case was waived due to financial hardship, and the statement in this court's decision that "[e]ach side shall bear its own costs" means that neither the government nor Mr. Ramos is entitled to costs. Accordingly, Mr. Ramos is not required to pay any fees or costs to the court or the government as a result of this court's January 3, 2013 order.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion for reconsideration is denied.

FOR THE COURT

____________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s25


Summaries of

Ramos v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 29, 2013
500 F. App'x 956 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Ramos v. Shinseki

Case Details

Full title:JOSE L. SERRANO RAMOS, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 29, 2013

Citations

500 F. App'x 956 (Fed. Cir. 2013)