From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 30, 2021
19 CIVIL 10616 (AT) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2021)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 10616 (AT) (KNF)

03-30-2021

MADELINE RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Stipulation and Order dated March 29, 2021, having received no objections to the Report & Recommendation (the "R&R"), ECF No. 44, of the Honorable Kevin Nathaniel Fox, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error, and found none. Santiago v. Colvin, 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to remand is GRANTED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The parties' cross motions for judgement on the pleadings are DENIED as moot. Dated: New York, New York

March 30, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Ramos v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 30, 2021
19 CIVIL 10616 (AT) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Ramos v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:MADELINE RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 30, 2021

Citations

19 CIVIL 10616 (AT) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2021)