From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Regal Entm't Grp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 18, 2023
1:22-cv-01011-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01011-SKO

01-18-2023

ANTHONY RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 11)

SHEILA K. OBERTO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On January 17, 2023, the appearing parties filed a joint stipulation (erroneously docketed as a motion to dismiss) dismissing the action without prejudice. (Doc. 11.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ramos v. Regal Entm't Grp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 18, 2023
1:22-cv-01011-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Ramos v. Regal Entm't Grp.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 18, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-01011-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)