From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Prosper

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 4, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0995 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0995 MCE DAD P.

May 4, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order filed March 13, 2007, petitioner was ordered to file and serve, within thirty days, a renewed motion for a stay. Petitioner has not filed a renewed motion or a procedural motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within 20 days from the date of this order petitioner shall file and serve a renewed motion for stay and shall show cause in writing why this court should not deem this matter submitted for decision.


Summaries of

Ramos v. Prosper

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 4, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0995 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2007)
Case details for

Ramos v. Prosper

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT FRANK RAMOS, Petitioner, v. K. PROSPER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 4, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0995 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2007)