From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Medina

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Mar 4, 2009
Case No. 2:08 CV 680 TC (D. Utah Mar. 4, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08 CV 680 TC.

March 4, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The court referred this case to Chief Magistrate Judge David Nuffer pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On February 17, 2009, Judge Nuffer, in a very thorough Report and Recommendation, recommended that Plaintiff's case be remanded to the state court because this court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.

The parties were given ten days to file objections to the Report and Recommendation and were cautioned that failure to file an objection could constitute waiver thereof upon subsequent review. No objections were filed.

The court, after de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, agrees that Judge Nuffer's conclusions are correct in all respects, and hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation as the order of the court. This court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, Plaintiff's case is remanded to the state court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ramos v. Medina

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Mar 4, 2009
Case No. 2:08 CV 680 TC (D. Utah Mar. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Ramos v. Medina

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. VERA MEDINA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Mar 4, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:08 CV 680 TC (D. Utah Mar. 4, 2009)