Ramos v. Diguglielmo

Full title: AURELIO RAMOS, Petitioner, v. DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, et al., Respondent

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 11, 2006

Civil Action No. 05-2363 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-2363.

January 11, 2006

ORDER

LAWRENCE STENGEL, Judge

AND NOW, this day of January, 2006, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Government's Response and Petitioner's Reply thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Reuter, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. Nos. 1,3) is DENIED with prejudice;

4. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue because we do not believe Petitioner has made "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); and

5. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.