From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 4, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

519140

12-04-2014

In the Matter of David RAMOS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Community Supervision et al., Respondents.

David Ramos, Auburn, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.


David Ramos, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: PETERS, P.J., STEIN, ROSE, EGAN JR. and DEVINE, JJ.

Opinion Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of making a false statement, being out of place and a movement regulation violation. The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge refunded to his inmate account. As petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Scott v. Fischer, 119 A.D.3d 1307, 989 N.Y.S.2d 922 [2014] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Ramos v. Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 4, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Ramos v. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID RAMOS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 4, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 1215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
995 N.Y.S.2d 866
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8544

Citing Cases

Tevault v. Prack

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…

Smith v. Prack

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…