Ramos v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.

Full title: Nelson C. RAMOS, et al., Appellants, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Oct 27, 2021

335 So. 3d 1228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1910

10-27-2021

Nelson C. RAMOS, et al., Appellants, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

Shield Law Group of Florida, LLC, and Jamie Alvarez, Jesse Peterson, Jonathan Chriqui and Clement Dean (Davie), for appellants. Kelley Kronenberg, P.A., and Kimberly J. Fernandes (Tallahassee), for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Shield Law Group of Florida, LLC, and Jamie Alvarez, Jesse Peterson, Jonathan Chriqui and Clement Dean (Davie), for appellants.

Kelley Kronenberg, P.A., and Kimberly J. Fernandes (Tallahassee), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See The Fla. Bar v. Greene, 926 So. 2d 1195, 1200 (Fla. 2006) ("Summary judgment is designed to test the sufficiency of the evidence to determine if there is sufficient evidence at issue to justify a trial or formal hearing on the issues raised in the pleadings."); Gonzalez v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 273 So. 3d 1031, 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) ("[T]he affidavits opposing summary judgment must identify admissible evidence that creates a genuine issue of material fact.") (quotations omitted), review denied, No. SC19-990, 2019 WL 6249341 (Fla. Nov. 22, 2019).