From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Blocker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Apr 14, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-697-FtM-38DNF (M.D. Fla. Apr. 14, 2015)

Opinion

Case No: 2:14-cv-697-FtM-38DNF

04-14-2015

ANGEL RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. CLEVELAND ALVIN BLOCKER, SR. and CAROLYN BLOCKER, Defendants.


ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Angel Ramos and Defendants Cleveland Alvin Blocker, Sr. and Carolyn Blocker's Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #12) filed on April 10, 2015.

Plaintiff brought this action against Defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et. seq., to recovery unpaid overtime compensation. (Doc. #1 at ¶¶ 1, 15-26). The parties now inform the Court that Plaintiff's claim against Defendants have been resolved in full without compromise. (Doc. #12). The Court thus does not need to approve the settlement for fairness. See Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir. 1982); King v. My Online Neighborhood, Inc., No. 6:06-cv-435-Orl-22JGG, 2007 WL 737575, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2007) ("Where the employer offers the plaintiff full compensation on his FLSA claim, no compromise is involved and judicial approval is not required." (citation omitted)).

Moreover, Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by "a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). To that end, the parties dismiss this case with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); and both parties have signed the Stipulation for Dismissal. (Doc. #12). The Court, therefore, dismisses the case with prejudice.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff Angel Ramos and Defendants Cleveland Alvin Blocker, Sr. and Carolyn Blocker's Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #12) is GRANTED.



(2) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 14th day of April, 2015.

/s/_________

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record


Summaries of

Ramos v. Blocker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Apr 14, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-697-FtM-38DNF (M.D. Fla. Apr. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Ramos v. Blocker

Case Details

Full title:ANGEL RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. CLEVELAND ALVIN BLOCKER, SR. and CAROLYN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Apr 14, 2015

Citations

Case No: 2:14-cv-697-FtM-38DNF (M.D. Fla. Apr. 14, 2015)