Opinion
525302
03-08-2018
In the Matter of Julio RAMOS, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
Julio Ramos, Stormville, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Julio Ramos, Stormville, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Before: McCarthy, J.P., Devine, Aarons, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENTProceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with drug use after his urine twice tested positive for THC 50. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charge and a penalty was imposed. Upon administrative review, the penalty was modified but the determination otherwise was affirmed. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge respondent's determination.
We confirm. The misbehavior report and the testimony of its author, together with the positive urinalysis test results and the related documentation, constitute substantial evidence to support the finding of guilt (see Matter of Blunt v. Annucci, 155 A.D.3d 1226, 1226, 63 N.Y.S.3d 275 [2017] ; Matter of Shepherd v. Annucci, 153 A.D.3d 1495, 1496, 61 N.Y.S.3d 386 [2017] ). While a date discrepancy indeed existed in the chain of custody section of the request for urinalysis test form, the correction officer who performed the test explained that this was a clerical error and confirmed that the actual testing dates and times were accurate (see Matter of Belle v. Prack, 140 A.D.3d 1509, 1510, 35 N.Y.S.3d 513 [2016] ; Matter of Green v. Annucci, 134 A.D.3d 1376, 1377, 21 N.Y.S.3d 646 [2015] ). Accordingly, petitioner's challenge to the chain of custody is unpersuasive (see Matter of Blunt v. Annucci, 155 A.D.3d at 1226–1227, 63 N.Y.S.3d 275 ; Matter of Lyons v. Annucci, 152 A.D.3d 1099, 1100, 56 N.Y.S.3d 477 [2017] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
McCarthy, J.P., Devine, Aarons, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.