From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos-Ramirez v. Borough

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 29, 2022
4:17-CV-01442 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2022)

Opinion

4:17-CV-01442

03-29-2022

EDWIN ANTHONY RAMOS-RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. BERWICK BOROUGH, KENNETH STRICH, REAGAN RAFFERTY, and RANDY GAUGER, Defendants.


ORDER

Matthew W. Brann, Chief United States District Judge

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 51) is DENIED:

1. Counts I (Morell claims against Defendants Berwick Borough and Kenneth Strish) and II (excessive force under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendant Reagan Rafferty) survive summary judgment.

2. Consistent with this Court's May 22, 2019 Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. 39; Doc. 40), Counts III (civil rights conspiracy against Defendants Strish, Rafferty, and Randy Gauger) and IV (state law tort claims against Defendant Rafferty) are dismissed.

3. A telephonic status conference will be scheduled by separate Order.


Summaries of

Ramos-Ramirez v. Borough

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 29, 2022
4:17-CV-01442 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Ramos-Ramirez v. Borough

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN ANTHONY RAMOS-RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. BERWICK BOROUGH, KENNETH…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 29, 2022

Citations

4:17-CV-01442 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2022)