Ramos-Mejia v. United States

Full title: CELVIN RAMOS-MEJIA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 1, 2022

CIVIL 3:22-cv-0803 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 1, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:22-cv-0803

12-01-2022

CELVIN RAMOS-MEJIA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants.

SYLVIA H. RAMBO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

SYLVIA H. RAMBO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 1^st day of December, 2022, upon consideration of the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9), to which no objections have been filed, and the court having satisfied itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record, Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010) (explaining that judges should review dispositive legal issues raised by the report for clear error), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

2) Ramos-Mejia's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute; and

3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.