From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramnanan v. Ali

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 21, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-1441 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:14-cv-1441 KJM CKD P

05-21-2015

ANDRE RAMNANAN, Plaintiff, v. N. ALI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 25) is denied. Dated: May 21, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
ramn1441.31


Summaries of

Ramnanan v. Ali

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 21, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-1441 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Ramnanan v. Ali

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE RAMNANAN, Plaintiff, v. N. ALI, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 21, 2015

Citations

No. 2:14-cv-1441 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 21, 2015)