Ramkhelawan v. State

Full title: ROSHAN RAMKHELAWAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 6, 2016

188 So. 3d 880 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 4D15–3824.

01-06-2016

Roshan RAMKHELAWAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Roshan Ramkhelawan, Fort Lauderdale, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Roshan Ramkhelawan, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court's order denying habeas corpus relief. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant seeking appellate review of the trial court's disposition of the Rule 3.850 motion following the evidentiary hearing and entry of a final order. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(k).

Affirmed without prejudice.

STEVENSON, GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.