From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Swingle

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 3, 2012
2:11-0045 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)

Opinion


ANDREW RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. D. SWINGLE, et al., Defendants. No. 2:11-0045 KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. January 3, 2012

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Pending before the court is defendants' December 21, 2011 motion to modify the scheduling order. Defendants request that the dispositive motion deadline be extended by forty-five days. Good cause appearing, defendants' motion is granted.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Defendants' motion to modify the scheduling order (Dkt. No. 33) is granted;

         2. The dispositive motion deadline is extended to February 6, 2012.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Swingle

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 3, 2012
2:11-0045 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Swingle

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. D. SWINGLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

Citations

2:11-0045 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)