From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Oct 18, 2017
No. 4D17-2104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 18, 2017)

Opinion

No. 4D17-2104

10-18-2017

ARNULFO RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Arnulfo Ramirez, Florida City, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 47-2007-CF-000934-A. Arnulfo Ramirez, Florida City, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant's right to seek any relief available with the Department of Corrections regarding enforcement of the 2008 sentencing order, and after exhaustion of administrative remedies, to seek mandamus relief in the circuit court if appropriate. Cooper v. State, 186 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). CIKLIN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Oct 18, 2017
No. 4D17-2104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Ramirez v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARNULFO RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Oct 18, 2017

Citations

No. 4D17-2104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 18, 2017)