From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 12, 2024
No. 05-24-00127-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 12, 2024)

Opinion

05-24-00127-CR

09-12-2024

ARISTEO ARTEAGA RAMIREZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 10 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. M23-04493

ORDER

NANCY KENNEDY, JUSTICE

Appellant's brief is overdue. Appellant's brief was originally due May 30, 2024. On May 31, 2024, we granted the motion for extension of time to file the brief filed by appellant's counsel, Nanette Hendrickson, and we directed that the brief be filed by June 29, 2024. On July 3, 2024, we granted Ms. Hendrickson's second motion for extension of time to file the brief, and we ordered her to file the brief by July 29, 2024. On July 30, 2024, we granted Ms. Hendrickson's third motion for extension of time to file the brief and ordered the brief filed by August 28, 2024. We cautioned Ms. Hendrickson that if the brief was not filed by August 28, 2024, we might abate the appeal for the trial court to make findings in accordance with Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8. As of the date of this order, appellant's brief has not been filed.

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant's brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant's presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant's absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. The trial court's findings shall include whether counsel has begun work on the brief. If the trial court finds that counsel has not begun work on the brief, then the trial court shall find the date counsel expects to begin work on the brief. The trial court shall also find the date counsel expects to file the brief.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We ORDER the court reporter for the hearing to file the reporter's record for the hearing within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated when the trial court's findings are received or at such other time as the Court deems appropriate.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Monique Huff, Presiding Judge, County Criminal Court No. 10, Dallas County; John Warren, Clerk of the County Criminal Courts of Dallas County, Texas; Trisha Phillips, Official Court Reporter, County Criminal Court No. 10; and counsel for all parties.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 12, 2024
No. 05-24-00127-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Ramirez v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARISTEO ARTEAGA RAMIREZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Sep 12, 2024

Citations

No. 05-24-00127-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 12, 2024)