From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Saxon Mortg. Servs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 9, 2011
Case No.: 11-CV-3726-LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 11-CV-3726-LHK

11-09-2011

OLIVIA JIMENEZ RAMIREZ; LUCIA R. JIMENEZ, Plaintiffs, v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., MERS; FV-1, INC., IN TRSUT FOR MORGAN STANLEY MORTAGE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC; DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

On June 9, 2011, Plaintiffs, in pro per, filed an action in California Superior Court alleging claims for "unlawful trustee sale;" violation of Cal. Civ. Proc. § 2923.5; breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and "defendant has not standing right to title." ECF No. 1, Ex. A, at 6. On July 29, 2011, the case was removed by Defendants based on diversity jurisdiction.

On August 5, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 4. After the case was reassigned to the undersigned on August 25, 2011, ECF No. 6, Defendants filed and served on Plaintiffs, by mail, an amended motion to dismiss on August 26, 2011. ECF No. 7. Per the Civil Local Rules, Plaintiffs' opposition was due September 9, 2011. On August 29, 2011, Defendants gave notice, by mail, to Plaintiffs that Plaintiffs' opposition was due on September 9, 2011, and that the motion was set for hearing on November 17, 2011. ECF No. 9. Plaintiffs failed to file an opposition on September 9, 2011, or any time thereafter. On September 14, 2011, Defendants gave notice, again by mail, that Defendants' motion was unopposed. ECF No. 11.

In light of Plaintiffs' failure to oppose Defendants' motion, the Court orders Plaintiffs to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. This Order does not authorize Plaintiffs to file an untimely opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs have until December 1, 2011, to file a response to this Order to Show Cause. A hearing on this Order to Show Cause is set for December 8, 2011, at 2:00 p.m, with a case management conference to follow. Failure to respond to this Order and appear at the December 8, 2011, hearing will result in dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The case management conference and hearing set for November 17, 2011, are hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN SENT TO:

Olivia Jimenez Ramirez

Lucia R. Jimenez

8 Estrella Circle Salinas, CA 93905

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

Juan P. Valdivieso,

Law Clerk


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Saxon Mortg. Servs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 9, 2011
Case No.: 11-CV-3726-LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Saxon Mortg. Servs. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OLIVIA JIMENEZ RAMIREZ; LUCIA R. JIMENEZ, Plaintiffs, v. SAXON MORTGAGE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 9, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 11-CV-3726-LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)