From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
May 28, 2009
No. 13-08-00378-CV (Tex. App. May. 28, 2009)

Opinion

No. 13-08-00378-CV

Opinion delivered: May 28, 2009.

On appeal from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

Before Justices YAÑEZ, RODRIGUEZ, and BENAVIDES.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The appellants' brief in the above cause was due on April 3, 2009. On April 17, 2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellants.

Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file their brief, or file their brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
May 28, 2009
No. 13-08-00378-CV (Tex. App. May. 28, 2009)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:LEONARDO RAMIREZ AND ANITA RAMIREZ, Appellants, v. PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: May 28, 2009

Citations

No. 13-08-00378-CV (Tex. App. May. 28, 2009)