From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Quick

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 27, 2023
1:22-cv-01610-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01610-ADA-SAB (PC)

02-27-2023

ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. J. QUICK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (ECF No. 9)

Plaintiff Israel Maldonado Ramirez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On January 19, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff's complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court's order. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with a court order, and failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action for the reasons stated above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Quick

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 27, 2023
1:22-cv-01610-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Quick

Case Details

Full title:ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. J. QUICK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 27, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-01610-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2023)