From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Perry's Delicatessen #10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
CASE NO. CV-11-1372-JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV-11-1372-JCS

10-05-2011

IRMA RAMIREZ and DAREN HEATHERLY, Plaintiffs, v. PERRY'S DELICATESSEN #10; ROBERT COCHRAN; and DONNA COCHRAN, Defendants.

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION Thomas E. Frankovich Attorney for Plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ and DAREN HEATHERLY, each an individual ROBERT COCHRAN, In Pro Per ROBERT COCHRAN, In Pro Per DONNA COCHRAN, In Pro Per DONNA COCHRAN, In Pro Per


THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

Attorneys for Plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ and DAREN HEATHERLY,

each an individual;

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and General Release ("Agreement") herein, each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one original document.

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

Thomas E. Frankovich

Attorney for Plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ and

DAREN HEATHERLY, each an individual

ROBERT COCHRAN, In Pro Per

ROBERT COCHRAN, In Pro Per

DONNA COCHRAN, In Pro Per

DONNA COCHRAN, In Pro Per

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the parties' Settlement Agreement and General Release for three years.

William Alsup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Perry's Delicatessen #10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
CASE NO. CV-11-1372-JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Perry's Delicatessen #10

Case Details

Full title:IRMA RAMIREZ and DAREN HEATHERLY, Plaintiffs, v. PERRY'S DELICATESSEN #10…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV-11-1372-JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)