From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 14, 2006
No. CV F 04-6384 REC WMW HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV F 04-6384 REC WMW HC.

February 14, 2006


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SUBSTITUTE CORRECT RESPONDENT


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

A petitioner filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus must name the state officer who has custody of the petitioner as the respondent. Rule 2 (a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 cases;Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891, 894 (9th Cir. 1996). Normally, the person having custody of an incarcerated petitioner is the warden of the prison in which the petitioner is incarcerated because the warden has "day-to-day control over" the petitioner. Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 1992); see also Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994).

In this case, petitioner is incarcerated at the Men's Colony at San Luis Obispo. At this time John Marshall is the warden of that prison. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to substitute John Marshall as the respondent in this action

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 14, 2006
No. CV F 04-6384 REC WMW HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Ramirez v. People

Case Details

Full title:ENRIQUE RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 14, 2006

Citations

No. CV F 04-6384 REC WMW HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2006)