From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 22, 2008
285 F. App'x 497 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-17395.

Submitted July 14, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed July 22, 2008.

Craig N. Moore, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Saipan, MP, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John S. Pangelinan, Seattle, WA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of the Northern Mariana Islands, David A. Wiseman, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. Nos. CV-07-00027-DAW, CR-06-00012-DAW.

Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


This is an appeal of the district court's denial of a motion to vacate or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because petitioner was no longer in custody.

Upon review of the record, the opening brief, and the May 19, 2008 letter from the United States Attorney, the court summarily reverses and remands this appeal to the district court. See Matus-Leva v. United States, 287 F.3d 758, 761 (9th Cir. 2002) (an individual subject to supervised release is in custody for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petitions).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 22, 2008
285 F. App'x 497 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John S. PANGELINAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 22, 2008

Citations

285 F. App'x 497 (9th Cir. 2008)