From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 1, 2016
Case No. CV 14-2008-JVS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-2008-JVS (KK)

03-01-2016

CARLOS RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. DAVID B. LONG, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code, section 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and all records on file. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with respect to Claim Two; (2) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to Claims One and Three; and (3) Respondent shall file an Answer to Claims One and Three within thirty days of the date of this Order. DATED: March 1, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 1, 2016
Case No. CV 14-2008-JVS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Long

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. DAVID B. LONG, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 1, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 14-2008-JVS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2016)