From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Kozoll

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 22, 2021
2:20-CV-0448-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-CV-0448-DMC-P

09-22-2021

CARLOS A. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. CASEY L. KOZOLL, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules, this case was not assigned to a District Judge when the case was filed. The parties have not consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction and the Court now finds that assignment of a District Judge is necessary to properly address the case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a District Judge and to update the docket to reflect the new case number.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Kozoll

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 22, 2021
2:20-CV-0448-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Kozoll

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS A. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. CASEY L. KOZOLL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

Citations

2:20-CV-0448-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2021)