Opinion
1:22-cv-01653-ADA-HBK (PC)
05-09-2023
ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. KHALE, et al., Defendant.
ORDER DENYING MOTION (DOC. NO. 18)
HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's pleading titled “motion to proceed with condolence of lawsuit I won from them to have today from them” filed on April 28, 2023. (Doc. No. 18). The motion fails to comport with the rules of procedure. The Court previously advised Plaintiff that all motions must “state with particularity the grounds for seeking the order; and state the relief sought.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(b(1)(B), (C). (See Doc. Nos. 11, 16). The motion is nonsensical and the Court cannot discern for what purpose Plaintiff submitted it.
According, it is ORDERED:
Plaintiff's motion (Doc. No. 18) is DENIED.