From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2018
Case No. SACV 16-1088- CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. SACV 16-1088- CJC (JEM)

01-08-2018

JAIME RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: January 8, 2018

/s/_________

CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2018
Case No. SACV 16-1088- CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2018)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:JAIME RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 8, 2018

Citations

Case No. SACV 16-1088- CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2018)