From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Mar 4, 2013
1:13-CV-22 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

1:13-CV-22

03-04-2013

JUAN CARLOS OLIVO RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH B. HALL, Respondent.


ORDER

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on January 28, 2013, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation. (Doc. 5.)

The Court has reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made. The Court's de novo determination is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in full.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is filed, but dismissed sua sponte, without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition, after he has exhausted his state court remedies and which corrects the defects of the current Petition. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Mar 4, 2013
1:13-CV-22 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:JUAN CARLOS OLIVO RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH B. HALL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

1:13-CV-22 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2013)

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Perry

(See Docket Entry 2, ¶ 9(h).) Beginning in 2013, Petitioner made multiple pro se filings in the state courts…