From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Flemming

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2015
2:14-cv-1937 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)

Opinion


RAUL ENRIQUE RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. B. FLEMMING, et al., Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-1937 KJM CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. March 6, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 2, 2015, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint. Plaintiff's motion was not, however, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. As a litigant proceeding in forma pauperis, plaintiff's pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Since plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint, the court is unable to evaluate it. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend must therefore be denied.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's March 2, 2015 motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 20) is denied.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Flemming

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2015
2:14-cv-1937 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Flemming

Case Details

Full title:RAUL ENRIQUE RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. B. FLEMMING, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 6, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-1937 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)