From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. FCA U.S. LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 30, 2024
2:24-cv-05025-FLA (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-05025-FLA (PVCx)

07-30-2024

CHRISTOPHER RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. FCA U.S. LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION [DKT. 11]

FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 29, 2024, the parties filed a Joint Notice of Settlement (“Notice”), stating the parties had agreed to settle the action. Dkt. 11. Having considered the Notice and finding good cause therefor, the court hereby ORDERS:

1. All deadlines governing this action are VACATED.
2. The court DISMISSES the action without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within ninety (90) days from the date of this Order, provided any request by a party to do so shall make a showing of good cause as to why the settlement has not been completed within the 90-day period, what further settlement processes are necessary, and when the party making such a request reasonably expects the process to be concluded.
3. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, which does not require approval of the court. Such stipulation shall be filed within the aforementioned 90-day period, or by such later date ordered by the court pursuant to a stipulation by the parties that conforms to the requirements of a showing of good cause stated above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. FCA U.S. LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 30, 2024
2:24-cv-05025-FLA (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Ramirez v. FCA U.S. LLC

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. FCA U.S. LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 30, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-05025-FLA (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2024)