Ramirez v. Ework, Inc.

Full title: MARTIN RAMIREZ, SYNERGEST, INC., an Illinois corporation, on behalf of…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 19, 2007

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00686-WDM-BNB (D. Colo. Jul. 19, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00686-WDM-BNB.

July 19, 2007

ORDER

BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before me on the Joint Motion for Limited Discovery Stay [Doc. # 138, filed 7/16/2007] (the "Motion"). The parties request a stay of discovery of 45 days while they continue to explore settlement. I previously granted a similar motion. Order [Doc. # 131, filed 5/23/2007].

I entered a Second Amended Joint Scheduling Order on August 7, 2006 [Doc. # 33] (the "Scheduling Order"). The Scheduling Order set a discovery cut-off of June 15, 2007. That date has elapsed. Until and unless an order enters extending the discovery period, there is no discovery to stay. In the meantime, however, I encourage the parties to continue their settlement efforts and to contact me if I can be of assistance in that regard.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED as moot.